Projects I wish I had time for

  1. Everyone Is Lying Again: A blog dissecting how, in response to the majority of even slightly controversial or partisanship-evoking news stories, all “sides” (right, left, etc.) grossly misrepresent the facts and/or their scientific, historical, or cultural context. Probably one dissection per week, allowing time for substantial research for each post.
  2. The Story of Rock Music: This podcast would guide the listener through the history of rock music, playing extended clips of >10 tracks per episode and helping the listener hear exactly how different styles developed, split off from their roots, and recombined later. For example in one episode I might explain what a raga is and play an example clip, then explain what modal vs. chordal improvisation is and play contrasting clips, then explain what blues rock is and play an example clip, then explain what post-bop jazz is and play an example clip, and finally talk through (with example clips) how these forms were fused together in the classic Mike Bloomfield track “East-West,” one of the earliest examples of “raga rock.” Episodes would proceed in roughly chronological order, so that the listener could “hear” the evolution of music over time, as later episodes build on the stylistic evolutions described in past episodes.
  3. Evolving Sounds: Relatedly, I’ve long wanted to research, compose, and record a many-hour continuous piece of music that recapitulates the entire history of “Western music” (which is better documented than other traditions). The piece would begin with sections composed in accordance with scholarly guesses about how prehistoric music might have sounded, eventually transition into the earliest styles from recorded history, then evolve into styles covered in e.g. Burkholder’s History of Western Music, up to the present day. This is a pretty obvious idea and I’m upset that nobody has attempted it yet.
  4. Everything is Awesome and We’re All Going to Die: This book would start off like a more thorough and epistemically scrupulous version of the empirical sections from Enlightenment Now, and would then proceed to explain in detail why global catastrophic risk is nevertheless increasing over time via Moore’s Law of Mad Science, inescapable asymmetry in the difficulty of creation vs. destructioninadequate equilibria, and related phenomena.
  5. Better Moral Judgments: Moral philosophy makes little attempt to estimate what our moral intuitions would be if we were smarter, better informed, etc. Works like The Righteous Mind and Moral Tribes1 are baby steps in the right direction, but still far less ambitious than what I sketch here, which could easily be expanded into quite a large research program. But I’d start with a book sketching out that research program and working through some initial examples.

Added on 9/10/2018:

  1. The Case For and Against Utilitarianism: Among families of theories in normative ethics, I think the utilitarian family has the most to recommend it, but no book on utilitarianism I’ve seen covers (in much depth) what I think are the most important arguments. In part that’s because some of the best arguments build on a perspective derived from Better Moral Judgments (see above), which has yet to be articulated in any detail. But it’s also because books on utilitarianism often say very little about developments in utilitarianism after Mill (who died in 1868!) or maybe Sidgwick (d. 1900). Arguments I’d cover, in roughly descending order of how compelling I’d expect to find them after further investigation: (1) a variety of reasons why better-informed moral reasoners would trend toward utilitarianism (e.g. because utilitarianism is least parochial/arbitrary and simplest), (2) classic arguments for expected utility maximization + complete class theorems + Harsanyi, (3) utilitarianism handles personhood fictionalism better, (4) a variety of pragmatic considerations, such as the central thesis of Moral Tribes, and other things including “utilitarian theories are better specified,” and (5) the historical track record of utilitarianism.2 I’d also cover what I think are the best arguments against utilitarianism, e.g. that it might break on infinities (kind of a problem given that the universe is likely infinite). Compared to other books, I’d spend much less time on “Do my current, immediate, stupid and uninformed moral intuitions like or dislike what utilitarianism vs. other theories recommend in such-and-such highly constructed scenarios?”, for reasons that a copy of me in a different Everett branch has explained in Better Moral Judgments.
  2. Moral Weight: Amazingly, in 2018, there is almost no literature attempting to estimate the comparative moral weight of different species’ lives and subjective experiences under varying assumptions. This book would build on some preliminary thoughts on the question I previously posted here.
  3. Very Important Facts: A blog that, once per month, publishes a post explaining and making the case for some extremely important fact (that isn’t ~universally acknowledged), e.g. (a) “Almost everything we care about and can measure has gotten better around the world since approximately the industrial revolution” and (b) “Nuclear winter is plausible in the next 50 years and would be incredibly devastating” and (c) “The number of animals (farmed or in the wild) who probably/plausibly have lower subjective welfare than humans living in extreme poverty is X/Y/Z (under different assumptions), and we could probably substantially help A/B/C of them (under different assumptions) in reasonably cost-effective ways” and of course (d) “AGI will likely be the most important development in the 21st century.” In other words, the blog would only cover things that are massively more important (in a “how good/bad for how many?” sense) than the worldview/policy/culture/science debates that dominate the attention of most citizens/journalists/scientists/etc.
  4. The Story of Film: Basically The Story of Rock Music (see above), but for film. Each video essay in the series would play >10 film clips per episode to show the viewer how different film techniques and styles evolved over time, split off from their roots, and recombined later. Episodes would proceed in roughly chronological order, so that the listener could watch the evolution of film technique and style over time, as later episodes build on the developments shown in past episodes.
  5. Moloch: A TV series (I’d write the scripts) about coordination problems resulting in nuclear conflict and nuclear winter. The series would trace the stories of a variety of high-level decision-makers and influencers, as well as ordinary citizens living in multiple countries, as tensions between two great powers increase. By the end of the first season, a variety of coordination problems (hence the title) and instances of incompetence/carelessness (see e.g. The Doomsday Machine or Command and Control) would lead to a large-scale exchange of nuclear weapons. Subsequent seasons would focus on the surviving characters’ struggles to survive under conditions of nuclear fallout and extended nuclear winter (a bit like Threads). The series would strive for realism, broad accessibility, and emotional impact. My goal would be for the series to be watched by heads of state and other high-level policymakers, and impact their decision-making in ways that reduce the likelihood of nuclear conflict, as The Day After may have via its influence on Reagan and perhaps Gorbachev.


Notes:
  1. I’d also list the methodology sections of Beckstead (2013) and these notes from a conversation with Carl Shulman. {}
  2. I’m not that optimistic about the “historical track record” argument but it’d be interesting to explore. For examples of why I’m not that optimistic, see the “Philo” section in this blog post. {}

Comments

  1. David Condon says

    #3 is such a brilliant idea that I might have to steal it. If I ever do it I’d have to cheat and use mostly pianoteq rather than finding and recording the actual instrumemts.

  2. Elvis says

    Luke, if you do the Story of Rock Music I promise to be forever loyal to you. Some sort of hybrid child of Scaruffi and Robert Greenberg. Talk about something amazing!

  3. says

    “Everything is Awesome and We’re All Going to Die” LOL. First, it’s awesome that this is how you’re thinking about these issues. I’ve literally been advocating for this dual “the world is getting way better but it’s also more dangerous than ever before” thesis for years. Second, this is pretty much the very book that I wrote! :-)

    (Additional thought: Pinker’s trends could constitute one reason for caring about GCRs in the first place. I wish he would recommend the danger and then propose this argument. Also, I’m increasingly dubious of many of Pinker’s “empirical” trends. EN is pretty disastrous in terms of scholarly or intellectual integrity — but I do agree with Chomsky that Pinker is right about the reality of moral progress.)

    • says

      Gah, sorry — wrote this in a car with spell-check on. The sentence “I wish he would recommend the danger and then propose this argument” should read, “I wish he would *recognize* the danger and then propose this argument [that “things getting better” could offer some extra motivation for ensuring that an existential catastrophe never happens].”

  4. Nick Reymann says

    I’d thought about #3 before, but it sounds like a nigh-impossible task for it to be accurate, cohesive, and actually good at the same time. Might as well just make a playlist of music progressing throughout history.

    • Nick Reymann says

      On a similar topic, there have been a few musical works that attempted to represent the evolution of humans/culture (though not musical styles in particular). Six Things to a Cycle by The Residents is one, and Charles Ives attempted to capture this on a cosmic scale with his (very much so) unfinished Universe Symphony.

  5. BF says

    Thank you for using lots of jargon and links to other, probably long-ish pieces to even understand what you mean/ what your argument is.

  6. Jason Dyer says

    When I was younger I wrote a piece like #3. It’s … not very good. (Not just being a young composer, but it ended up being a bit on-the-nose, if that makes sense.)

  7. SG says

    My nomination for “very important fact” is the reality that nearly all developed countries are subject to a fatally flawed monetary policy regime (backward-looking inflation targeting) that results in continued business cycles (i.e. periodic recessions) when there is an obviously superior alternative (forward-looking NGDP level targeting) that has been advocated by top macroeconomists from across the political left (Paul Krugman, Christy Romer, Brad Delong)/right (Larry Kudlow, Greg Mankiw, Scott Sumner), academia (Michael Woodford), industry (Jan Hatzius), government (Charles Evans), etc.

    Yet despite all of the above, modernizing monetary policy has zero political or media relevance and major central banks remain on course to repeat all the significant mistakes of the Great Recession.

    • Matthias Goergens says

      Free banking with competitive note issue would be even better and easier to get right, in the sense that the laws and regulations are even simpler: mostly just stop treating banks as special cases.

      George Selgin has shown how competitive note issue stabilises nominal GDP levels on its own. (Both in history and in theory.)

      (The main intuition is that when people want to hold on to more money, that both means velocity of money slows down (is less spending per dollar in existence), but also that it’s profitable for private banks to issue more of their own money, because it’s less likely to come back to them for clearing in any one day.)

  8. Mike says

    Re #7, Kagan has a forthcoming book on something very close to this topic, though probably more focused on foundational issues and less on the details of specific cases than what you have in mind. Korsgaard has a book that just came out that’s also relevant. I wouldn’t be surprised if following these there’s more applied ethics on these issues.

    They each have articles with material from their books available here: http://www.jpe.ox.ac.uk/issues/volume-6-number-1-june-2018/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *